News: THE MULE, directed by and starring Clint Eastwood: now on disc and streaming!


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: Today at 04:49:39 PM 
Started by Ken Dodd - Last post by Bobby Maxwell
Cheap ones from the five-and-ten-cent store? (Remember, his trousers cost $29.50.)  :D

Good luck, post a picture if you want, we'd enjoy seeing it!  :)

PS, in this country, it's spelled Callahan ... the Italians do insist on putting in that "g," though. ;)




Yeah well, it's a proper name, so that makes the Italians WRONG.

 2 
 on: Today at 04:47:35 PM 
Started by Wirral Writer - Last post by Bobby Maxwell
Itís up to Clint.

Golly gee Beav, I never wouldda guessed.

 3 
 on: Today at 02:35:52 PM 
Started by Doug - Last post by myk8rn
i watched the mule today, clint is such a great actor really commands the screen, but i can relate in my own life to what was portrayed on screen, although i have not got anything to do with drugs. :smitten:

 4 
 on: Today at 02:30:46 PM 
Started by Doug - Last post by myk8rn
What's the latest Eastwood movie you've seen?

For me, I watched Bird tonght.  It's only the fourth time I've seen the movie, despite the fact that it's just an incredible film, but it's a difficult one to watch as well, as we witness Charlie Parker's struggles with his music and his drug addiction.

 5 
 on: Yesterday at 02:31:58 PM 
Started by AKA23 - Last post by AKA23
Sounds nice! Wish I could go to that, especially the after party! :)

 6 
 on: Yesterday at 01:01:30 AM 
Started by AKA23 - Last post by Saman Moradkhani
For the first time in recent years. This happens for a Clint movie.



and


 7 
 on: November 14, 2019, 04:37:54 PM 
Started by The Schofield Kid - Last post by Christopher
I'm contemplating if I want to see Doctor Sleep even though I haven't read the book yet. The book came out six years ago, so obviously I could have read it by now if I'd really wanted to (it is one I've been interested in reading). Anyone watch it yet?

 8 
 on: November 14, 2019, 02:13:55 PM 
Started by AKA23 - Last post by Perry


 Like I said, you hope the movie is a well made movie that people will go see. The other negative aspects just be prepared. I remember reading many reviews for 'The Mule' when it came out and all they did was mention Trump ( you got the feeling he was starring in the freaking movie) and all this political stupidity which had nothing to do with the movie. It was a farce. In the long run all it was is a movie and ultimately the movie made over 100 mill which was fine. I thought the movie was decent, but like anyone else I want to see a good movie. in the real world that's what should prevail, but it doesn't......

 9 
 on: November 14, 2019, 02:04:08 PM 
Started by Doug - Last post by Perry


To be honest AKA, I think I shared the same reason that she was too young and the budding romance was predictable. I just didn't believe it for a second. I do like the movie, but that aspect of it was eh...

 10 
 on: November 14, 2019, 12:17:54 PM 
Started by AKA23 - Last post by Saman Moradkhani
Clint's movie was in more theaters. Vice may have gone with a limited release rollout. Clint's movie did bring in more per theater:

Vice: in 2,442 theaters, $3,181 per theater

The 15:17 to Paris: in 3,042 theaters, $4,126 per.

Figures from Boxofficemojo.com.

I don't think more 600 theaters have that remarkable impact. And let's not forget Clint's movie was a February release, not an award friendly December release and of course without that huge amount of ads, promoting and campaigning. X-factor is just Clint himself. that's it.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10



C L I N T E A S T W O O D . N E T