Philo Beddoe Jr
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 1750

|
 |
« on: November 14, 2003, 11:02:42 PM » |
|
VERY good news for Melbourne and Victorian Clint fans. I was having a look at the 'Astor' movie guide, and noticed in the backdated section that they had screened 'The Good the Bad and the Ugly' on October 4  . Imagine my dissapointment! BUT.... As I scrolled down the list, Joy of Joys: Sunday Jan 11 and Monday Jan 12: 'GBU'. AND THEN  An entire THREE WEEK SEASON from Feb 15 to March 6 of 'A Fistful of Dollars' and 'For a Few Dollars More', screening together in the same session. That is all three classic Clint Eastwood spagetti westerns lovingly presented in their correct aspect ratio as the director intended up on the big 20 metre Astor screen! You can get up now, it really is true  . WKC
|
|
« Last Edit: November 14, 2003, 11:19:14 PM by wkc »
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philo Beddoe Jr
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 1750

|
 |
« Reply #7 on: March 09, 2004, 05:42:06 AM » |
|
I saw them and will make a few comments if you will humour me..... Fistful of Dollars was a very weathered looking print. Fortunately, For a Few Dollars more (my favourite of the two) looked brilliant and crisp in comparison. They are both supposed to be remastered prints. I guess Fistful was in pretty bad shape  . It was a real treat to see these two ultra classic Eastwood films on the gigantic wide screen. It was the final night of a three week run and the large cinema was quite full. Melbournites must still love their Clint Eastwood  . There is another one night rescreening of these two coming up mid year, and that will be followed by a single night rescreening of GBU, so luckily I have not missed out on seeing it after all.. I think I may even rewatch the first two again! I really feel like a very lucky Clint Eastwood fan  . WKC.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Philo Beddoe Jr
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 1750

|
 |
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2004, 08:16:44 AM » |
|
How were the colours?
Hi Philo, keeping in mind that I am very mildly colour blind.... Skin/hair/eye colours were good, with fairly deep rich natural looking tones. Cloth garments etc seemed generally drab and dusty but overall looked soft and natural. Colonel Mortimer's garb (mainly his vest) stands out in my memory as a bit of an exception, being very richly coloured and textured. Indoor scenes had rich colours in the furniture, old wood panelling, walls/cupboards etc. Outdoor scenes, the villages and huts etc looking pretty much like you'd expect them to, dry and dusty and muted under the glaring sun. I suppose you would describe the overall intended look of the films colourwise as subdued but deep? For the most part nothing seemed overly colourful (excepting skin tones, some clothing, some furniture textures etc), but everything seemed fairly naturally and richly textured. WKC.
|
|
« Last Edit: March 10, 2004, 08:37:24 AM by wkc »
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|