|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hocine
Full Member
  
Offline
Posts: 234
|
 |
« Reply #193 on: August 15, 2019, 02:46:03 AM » |
|
BTW, how do you feel about this rapid and fast filming? Do you think it's a good sign or a bad one?
Well, if filming was wrapped, I wouldn’t be surprised at all, since Clint likes going fast when shooting a picture. One of his worst experiences in movies was when shooting Paint Your Wagon because filming lasted 5 months at least. He was stuck in Oregon. According to him, he was so bored. Eventually, he took a farm with some hogs to get busy. So, shooting a picture fastly for Clint is not a good sign or a bad sign: it’s just his way of shooting a picture. I only hope that Richard Jewell won’t be an other 15:17 to Paris. But I’m optimistic.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Saman Moradkhani
Full Member
  
Offline
Posts: 233
|
 |
« Reply #194 on: August 15, 2019, 04:15:24 AM » |
|
Well, if filming was wrapped, I wouldn’t be surprised at all, since Clint likes going fast when shooting a picture. One of his worst experiences in movies was when shooting Paint Your Wagon because filming lasted 5 months at least. He was stuck in Oregon. According to him, he was so bored. Eventually, he took a farm with some hogs to get busy. So, shooting a picture fastly for Clint is not a good sign or a bad sign: it’s just his way of shooting a picture. I only hope that Richard Jewell won’t be an other 15:17 to Paris. But I’m optimistic.
I'm sure this one will be one of Clint's finest works in a decade. Because unlike the 15:17 to Paris, this one is not a 5 min story. this one is an unforgettable tragic story and meanwhile a forgotten one by the majority of people nowadays. This one has been in development hell for years. Unlike many other stories, this one wasn't abandoned by Clint after moving on to another project. There must be sth special in it which kept Clint thinking about it for almost 5 years.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 15, 2019, 07:41:16 AM by KC »
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
Macpherson
Full Member
  
Offline
Posts: 135
|
 |
« Reply #197 on: August 15, 2019, 11:20:35 AM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Hocine
Full Member
  
Offline
Posts: 234
|
 |
« Reply #199 on: August 15, 2019, 06:11:47 PM » |
|
I'm sure this one will be one of Clint's finest works in a decade. Because unlike the 15:17 to Paris, this one is not a 5 min story. this one is an unforgettable tragic story and meanwhile a forgotten one by the majority of people nowadays. This one has been in development hell for years. Unlike many other stories, this one wasn't abandoned by Clint after moving on to another project. There must be sth special in it which kept Clint thinking about it for almost 5 years.
I agree with you, Saman Moradkhani. For Clint, The 15:17 to Paris was just an opportunity to do something different. This time, with Richard Jewell, Clint seems to have good elements: the cast, the script, the director. So, wait and see.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|