I think Harry’s character (referring more to the man Callahan – not what the writers concocted on paper) – was honed from a combination of deep pain (loss of his wife), his abhorrence and distrust of a current law system (protecting the criminal), and a deep-rooted sense of right and wrong. I think the latter is what balanced him out. He didn’t always go with the flow among those he served under or worked with, although they were on the same team. He didn’t break the law….just ‘bent’ it a little at times, if need be, to get the job done; but he never made himself a criminal by doing so. That morality within him to keep a stable society safe from going completely into chaos was his driving force, and I think also one ingredient of his innocence. If asked point blank why he did what he did, we already know his answer:
“I don’t know…..I really don’t.” Even if he didn’t completely know, he was driven to do what he did. I don’t think you can separate the independence from the deep-seated morality within him.
About the closest real-life example I can think of an independent, against-the-system cop is
Frank Serpico, who ultimately retired and left the country – I believe for his own survival and protection…and out of disgust. It appears the only way to mete true justice or not get sucked in the normal corrupt system (and
live) is to do it on celluloid. And Dirty Harry is just the man to do it.
All I know is the Ray-Ban corporation certainly isn't complaining.
