football (english,champions,uefa) season 2005-2006

[vik]

glory glory man utd

come on the red devils 

and we still have a rio 

lets get them debrecen's

man utd season starts tomorrow

[Gant]

3rd place again for you guys.. if your lucky.

[vik]

nah champions as always

[little_bill]

i think utd will be lucky to finish top two if they don't get their heads sorted before saturday, they need a strong start to the season and they've been missing one for the last two seasons.
i think liverpool will make a shock entry in the top three after the CL i don't think they fear chelsea at all, and that could lead to a difficult time for the blues, ye know some of them will be suffering from big head syndrome (they caught it off their manager)

[vik]

3 - 0

that will do for starters

rooney, van nistleroy, ronaldo

[bito]

Good for United, but is was also a team they should beat, but they will not win the Champions League 2005-06


Liverpool plays tonight   come on your reds

Top 4 in Premier League 2005-06

Liverpool     Chelsea  Arsenal  MU   I hope so

[vik]

hoping and a wishin there bito

liverpool - he he

man utd, chelsea, arsenal, liverpool (maybe)

[bito]

Yes I hope, and I think I have right but we must see to the spring

MU win Premier League no no 

Liverpool will win the 19 championchip

[little_bill]

hoping and a wishin there bito

liverpool - he he

man utd, chelsea, arsenal, liverpool (maybe)

considering liverpool are the european champs yous seem to be writing them off very quickly.

utd have a lot to prove this year they haven't started the season well for the last two years, they can't win the prem if they don't have a strong start. i think ferdinand could be a problem, he doesn't want to be there, he's sulking over not getting a big payday move to chelsea but i don't think they want him anymore, he's no loyalty, fergie should find a replacement for him soon.
the match was a bit sloppy yesterday, if that disallowed goal had have stood just after half time it would have been a different story. neville isn't up to scratch yet, he needs more work to be premiership fit for saturday, the talk of michael owen coming is good for the forwards, rooney and van nistelrooy will be out to prove they don't need him, it could lead to some quality performances from the frnt two, but utd again looked weak  across the back.

[vik]

we don't need owen - he is old and past it

we have rooney and ronaldo

van nistleroy will eventually get replaced with young blood - but van nistleroy has the experience of owen and is 100 times better - he was injured last year remember - van nistleroy looked good last night - he has alot to give

rio is just fine - so which of the footballers don't want a big payday

the commentators put keano down last night for making five tackles - football is about tackles - agreed not the arsenal every two minutes type foul - so keano got booked - he did his job

man utd  could have taken home the fa cup but they met an arsenal team who won on penalties, given the league man utd was over arsenal

liverpool as i remember won on penalties - champions of what - they had to be given entry into the championship this year, i am of the opinion you should earn it

man utd had a good season last year - they certainly entertained

i think your opinion is good, but i think slightly incorrect  or anyway different and still valid, but heh cool we wait and see

[little_bill]

vik
1. i never said anything about keano, i thought the match was sloppy rom man utd, i thought keano played well, i might not like utd but i love keano, so stop trying to say i said something about him that i didn't.
2. ac milan won the CL two years ago, ON PENALTIES
3.owen is 25 thats 4 years younger than van nistelrooy, he scored 16 goals in 26 appearnces for real, thats brilliant football, he's agreat player, and if fergie is interested i wouldn't be rubbishing him. and ronaldo is a winger, you should be pointing out the likes of smith and saha as your replacment strikers.
4.

man utd had a good season last year - they certainly entertained

, no they didn't, they didn't win a thing they were miles off winning the prem. and most of it as i said was down to a terrible start, and those are the comments of alex ferguson.
5.

given the league man utd was over arsenal

no, arsenal were 2nd utd were 3rd

just because you support a team you can't bury your head in the sand and ignore the problems

[vik]

look at the end your opinion is like everyone elses, i accept differences in opionions

it seems you don't like man utd

by the way some footballers never make the grade - smith and saha - show that nothing has changed and kleberson

[little_bill]

i have read it agin, you took out the bit about me criticising keano, which i never did, outside of that your post is still way off man.
rio showed you no loyalty after you stood by him through the missed drugs test scandal and ensuing 9 month ban. he's a mercenary, van nistelrooy was right to have a go at him in japan.

[vik]

i didn't say anything about rio his ban etc. because at this point we were not discussing it and we won't be - thats his problem etc. done and dealt with

and i didn't criticise you, maybe you thought so?

please don't jump to conclusions where they are warranted my post is just fine - i tried to answer what you wrote fairly and i think i did that

this board is about discussion and i think we have done quite well

[little_bill]

you lied about me saying something about roy keane, and now you say i'm rude,

as for the ban we were talking about rio and his lack of loyalty
i said your better off without him
 you said

rio is just fine - so which of the footballers don't want a big payday

so i expanded on my opinion on why you're better off without him, you didn't need to talk about the ban, it's my opinion on why you don't need him. it's an example of his lack of loyalty.
pointing out utd's weaknesses doesn't mean i'm a utd hater, i just amn't a utd supporter i already said i don't like them i'm indifferent to them.

all i can see is i posted facts to back up my opinions and you accuse me of being rude.

[vik]

where did i say you were rude ? i have done nothing but said you have an opinion different to mine

so you are indifferent to man utd, fine

[little_bill]

you do understand that this
 « Last Edit: Today at 05:58:02 AM by vik »
shows that you have now edited your posts. you think you're being smart Vik but the truth is your opinions were uninformed, you stated things about me persoanlly,
a that i criticised keano and
b that i was being rude
and when i called you out on both counts you went back and edited your posts.
have the courage to stand by what you said originally.

[vik]

why - whats on the board is what i thought

you don't seem to have a sort of reasoning there

[little_bill]

my problem is you are being dishonest

[vik]

this is a discussion board - you seem to conclude that everything is said is against you

whereas they are good posts - well balanced