football (english,champions,uefa) season 2005-2006

[philo]

I must add  ....

Nothing against Denmark, quite simply they took the chances they had and scored some good goals.


Philo .

[MillionDollarBaby]

I am losing a little bit of patience on account of the stupid amount of changes.

Nobody can learn a damn thing from playing some players (with other settled members of the squad) for a matter of a few minutes or one half at the most.

They do that cos cryers like moriniho tell the manager not to allow lampard and terry play a full game. Its not the managers fault, im sure he would like to play the best possible team through out the whole match, but there club managers dont allow it mainly becasue they have a big premiership game in 3 days

[vik]

not so - the ruling is he could play them if he wanted to

this is the national squad - they should be playing a full match together - this falls solely on eriksson as has all the other matches

who is mourinhno anyway - who cares about him

[buckfastbigd1888]

                                                                                                                                                                         Come on the old Denmark hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. Cant help myself with that due 2 the fact Scotland got a credible result for a change. While our invincible brothers south of the border got as we say humped by a bunch of scandinavians. England for the world cup they say,  theyll b lucky 2 qualify come on the wales.

[Gant]

Wales... 

England were poor.. only Rooney seemed to be taking it seriously. We wern't too bad in the first half but just stpped performing in the second..

James is the Ena Sharples of fooball..Always got his head in the back of a net.

[MillionDollarBaby]

whats do u mean, dont u know anything about football, club managers can not allow there players to play international football if they wanted because its there players and its risking them getting injured, and for someone whos posting in a football thread, i cant believe u dont know who morinho is. He is Chelseas manager, the club who won the premiership and the club liverpool BEAT in the champions  league semi final.

i do hate it wen england always change the players around, but sometimes he as no choice

[vik]

who doesn't know moronhino is he's the whiniging whining baby that should have nothing to do with english football  ... enough said

alot of people here know their football very well and for those who don't they are still entiled to express an opinion

[buckfastbigd1888]

                                                                                           Big weekend up in Scotland this weekend because the show that is the old firm derby is in town. Ive Been looking forward to this one for months now even though Celtic have been pretty poor. However, when it comes to these games no one can predict whats going to happen though i think Celtic will win. Another fact anyone slagging Mourinho should just hope he quits chealsea and goes to their club. Hes done in 3 seasons what other managers cant do in their full careers. That includes Sir Alex, Wenger, Benitez and any one else to be honest. So any one who supports anyone but Chealsea I feel for you because the title will be going nowhere but stamford bridge as long as Mourinho and Abramovich are in town and if you dont like it tough!!!!

[vik]

yeh celtic v rangers games are good we sometimes get them on tv

from my  point of view on moronhino is that there is more to football than whinging managers and i hope he never comes to my team and that the same as wenger

and the same with eriksson - good riddance they do very little for the english game - go back to the continental rubbish of winning whatever the cost - me i would rather see good football

some of the best football was not played by chelsea - it take two teams to make a game and there are a few more than chelsea in the premiership

english football is about responsible players and coaches
i would never want to see ferguson replaced by any continental

english football very rarely had the tugging of shirts the kicking off the ball etc. that comes with some other teams

so many good goals are lost because someone pulls the shirt of someone, sometimes not even on the ball but prevents goals being scored

if rooney and ronaldo are the future of football then its going to be good

[Gant]

Come on Millwall   

[vik]

hope they beat chelsea 

[MillionDollarBaby]

alot of people here know their football very well and for those who don't they are still entiled to express an opinion

i didnt say u couldnt express an opinion but wen u say "the ruling is he could play them if he wanted to" is a statement which is wrong, and thats all im correcting

[vik]

what are you going on about ?

whatever your discussing i don't know if its football

[MillionDollarBaby]

im sorry but u are wierd, how can u not know whats going on when ur the one that sed it and im quoting it. just face it, u think u know something about football and ur wrong, tough luck

sophie xxx

[vik]

why don't you try and actually write your point of view - however limited it seems to be - you write like you have trouble understanding anything, so how you expect anybody else to understand it

[Gant]

Come on gals..calm down. 
It's only a game.

[MillionDollarBaby]

write down my point of view?, what do u think i done on my first post, here, to make u understand a little better which doesnt seem something that u can do ill put quotes in, if u know what they are!

Philo wrote this - 'I am losing a little bit of patience on account of the stupid amount of changes.

Nobody can learn a damn thing from playing some players (with other settled members of the squad) for a matter of a few minutes or one half at the most.

so i got my POINT OF VIEW across my saying - 'They do that cos cryers like moriniho tell the manager not to allow lampard and terry play a full game. Its not the managers fault, im sure he would like to play the best possible team through out the whole match, but there club managers dont allow it mainly becasue they have a big premiership game in 3 days'

but u obviously know nothing about football cos u sed - not so - 'the ruling is he could play them if he wanted to'

I again got my point across by saying whats do u mean, dont u know anything about football, club managers can not allow there players to play international football if they wanted because its there players and its risking them getting injured, and for someone whos posting in a football thread, i cant believe u dont know who morinho is. He is Chelseas manager, the club who won the premiership and the club liverpool BEAT in the champions  league semi final.


do you understand now?......

[vik]

ok could you clarify these 2 questions if they are in the above

1. are you saying eriksson couldn't play players - i am asking you who could he not play?

he had nearly a full squad on the pitch, he had a full set of reserves

eriksson is an adult if he can't play players i think he would have said, he also has a duty to the country and to the people who pay to watch the games, from what i gather before the game he said he would be playing with no changes or minimal(it would be a full squad work out)

2. so are you saying eriksson was under strict instructions not to play players? or did some  have injury doubts

(and nobody really cares about moronhino he is a big baby)

[philo]

Philo wrote this

I knew I would be involved here somewhere.  


Gant is right .... It is only a game and opinions.



Philo.  

[vik]

yeh but at least the opinions could be coherent