Clint Eastwood Forums

General Information => Eastwood News => Topic started by: KC on December 13, 2019, 01:33:49 AM

Title: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: KC on December 13, 2019, 01:33:49 AM
Richard Jewell opens in the US today, so it's time to get our traditional "members' comments" threads started.

We welcome all thoughts and comments and even full-fledged reviews of the film, but please... NO SPOILERS IN THIS THREAD. If you feel that what you want to say about the film may spoil it for those who haven't yet seen it, then please post in our SPOILERS thread for Richard Jewell:

http://www.clinteastwood.org/forums/index.php?topic=10915.0
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: honkytonkman on December 13, 2019, 04:25:18 AM
It won't be possible for me to see "Richard Jewell" until January 22nd , the date of its Belgian release, and therefore I will be delighted to read your first impressions here and see if you think or confirm, like some reviews I have read, that 'This is Eastwood's best movie since' Letters from Iwo-Jima '...

Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: exit00 on December 13, 2019, 12:52:06 PM
Watched this at a 11:30 screening with a pretty good crowd of 30-40 people.  I liked this a lot and maybe more than any other Eastwood "true-life" films.  The tension during the bombing scene was typical great Eastwood direction.  Rockwell is very good as the lawyer but Hauser as Jewell is so terrific.... I hope he isn't skipped over during Oscar time.... he so effectively makes us feel the pain of what Jewell had to go thru as an innocent guy.   I wouldn't say it was the "best" movie Eastwood has made since Letters From Iwo-Jima (I would have to put Gran Torino in that spot) but it's certainly a very good, well crafted movie.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Matt on December 13, 2019, 06:51:33 PM
I saw this at the 4:00 showing today. Clint has a loyal base here in Tennessee. I remember being surprised to get the last tickets to see The Mule on opening day when I waited until the last minute to buy them, and this happened again for Richard Jewell. The later showings were sold out, but there were a couple of seats left for the matinee. So, we got to see this in a packed theater filled to the gills with senior citizens and definite Trump supporters (you could tell by their reactions to certain jokes regarding the press and FBI).

As for the movie -- I liked it a lot. Clint's style is almost dated, but in a good way. He tells an enthralling story that's dialogue and character-focused with little action -- and that in itself is what I mean by "dated". The pacing isn't rushed, and at times it feels a bit slow, but only because newer movies have a faster pace and you can easily forget what it's like to just relax and watch a more leisurely paced film.  The acting was good across the board, but as pointed out, Paul Walter Hauser is the best of the cast in the title role. But, it's my opinion that he won't win an Oscar for the performance. I would be surprised if Richard Jewell wins anything (or is even nominated) at the Oscar's, but that doesn't take away from the enjoyable experience of seeing the film. It just didn't feel like award-winning material. But, I'm glad Clint made it -- it was a worthwhile subject and a really good movie. I can't quite give it an 8/10, so I'll settle with a grade of 7.5/10. It's a thumbs-up either way!
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Jed Cooper on December 15, 2019, 10:37:30 AM
I complain about movies Clint directs but doesn’t star in, but I’ll be checking this out soon.  If anything, I’m looking forward to redemption for The 15:17 To Paris. 

The subject matter does look interesting and from what I’ve seen in the trailers thus far, appears to be an entertaining, thought-provoking film.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Rawhide7 on December 16, 2019, 06:22:27 PM
Really good movie. Acting in this movie was awesome by everyone. Reflection on Eastwoods great directing.  Highly recommend everyone see this film.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Perry on December 18, 2019, 03:39:08 PM



        Which is the main reason most people wont see it. It doesn't have special effects, comic book characters or a robot.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Rawhide7 on December 18, 2019, 09:24:54 PM
I know right Perry. It's sad. But you are right. I've never been much into all the special effects. Not a huge fan of the marvel hero type movies. With the exception of Batman. I like 1989 Batman movie and The Dark Knight. But that's pretty much it. I like just a good movie with a good plot/storyline good atmosphere, and great acting. The Mule was a great movie to me. I've always preferred movies that Eastwood acts in over direct only movies. But the man is a great director.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Jed Cooper on December 19, 2019, 01:12:05 PM
Very well done!  This movie held my interest from beginning to end.  I haven’t enjoyed an Eastwood directed, non-starring film this much since Mystic River.  As I was leaving the theater with Uncle Andy, I noticed a couple of elderly ladies still sitting as the credits rolled.  I couldn’t resist good-naturedly saying to them, “I still want one more Clint Eastwood western!”  They smiled and agreed.  I asked Andy what he thought of us flying to California to convince Mr. Eastwood to star in one more western.  Maybe we’d get bit parts, dress up in cowboy outfits and ride horses!  At 89, if anybody can make a good western at that age, it’s Clint Eastwood!

Ok, back on track with Richard Jewell.  For me, it succeeded where The 15:17 To Paris failed.  I can’t pinpoint why.  The only major difference is that professional actors weren’t used in the principal roles so perhaps that’s it.  One trend I notice with his movies he only directs is that the subject matter IS always interesting.  Selfishly, I’d rather see him direct an action movie or western but it’s not my career.  My indifference was washed away with satisfaction with this latest installment in Clint’s singularly, long-lasting and iconic career.  Regardless of box office performance and how many awards it may or may not win, this is a winner to me.(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191219/1d9b46fd75598bb88b849117a7759434.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Perry on December 19, 2019, 01:19:34 PM

  Well, Rawhide7 ,there really hasn't been much to be persuaded to go see in the movie theatres on a consistent basis for many years and I don't think it has anything to do with the fact I'm older. I remember being dragged to go see Star Wars in 1977 as a kid and saying to myself, " What is this s--t?" I knew even then the movie industry would never be the same. Eventually I'll go see the Jewell movie, but like many in this forum I'm tired of the Biography movies Eastwood has done over the years.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: AKA23 on December 26, 2019, 01:04:32 PM
I saw this. Like many of Eastwood's recent true life story pictures, this isn't a movie that I would have made. There just isn't that much story to cover, and since I remembered the events of the film, I knew the way it would all end. For me, part of the appeal of watching movies is the surprise and the suspense that can only be generated when watching a story that I am not already familiar with.

However, like "Sully,"  I think this is the best possible version of this story that Eastwood could have made. Paul Walter Hauser, from the perspective of the quality of the movie and not its commercial prospects, was definitely the right choice for Richard Jewell. He looks so much like him, and his mannerisms and voice were well matched to Jewell's. The principal roles are very well cast overall. Sam Rockwell was also a good choice for Jewell's lawyer, and Olivia Wilde also seemed to fit the character to me. One thing I did notice was that the portrayal of Kathy Scruggs did not make her look very good, and it wasn't just the sex for tips scene that gave that impression. I have no idea whether the character as depicted in the movie was true to life or not, but she came across as erratic, lacking empathy, manipulative, and a bit chaotic. The film did not make her look like a very professional reporter. If not true to life, this portrayal is an odd take on the character. The film is also edited and directed nicely, and unlike some of Eastwood's more recent films, I thought this had a pretty tight and well written script.

It covers a lot of the same ground as "Sully," so in the back of my mind, while watching it, I wondered what drew Eastwood to this particular story beyond wanting to honor Richard Jewell as a person. Sully did his job as he was trained and was initially hailed as a hero as a result. Subsequent to those actions, his actions were questioned, and the government bodies responsible for investigating the incident made it seem like he had done the wrong thing. These are the same themes as "Richard Jewell" where the F.B.I. and the media stand in for the NTSB.

Another thing that struck me while watching it is a lack of understanding for what has caused Clint to become such a right-wing filmmaker in recent years and why he seems to be making movies, at least in part, for reasons other than the belief that they would result in really entertaining movies."Sully," American Sniper," "The 15:17 to Paris," and now this film were clearly all made to honor their subjects and promote conservative viewpoints. I think "J. Edgar" partly also fits into this category since it was clearly made to humanize rather than to cast a more objective, critical eye on his place in history. "Gran Torino" and "The Mule" also have some pretty clear conservative tones underlying them as well. Many of these films also clearly cast aspersions on either the institutions of society or more liberal thinkers who, for example, may not view someone like Chris Kyle in a rarified light, or who may have more respect for the government or the media than these films suggest we should.

Unlike many reviewers who were unwilling to look past their own preconceived ideas about the agenda the film pushes, I was able to look past some of these impulses and view the film as its own entity. On that basis, its a well done film, but I also understand why some see a consistent desire in Eastwood's recent films to promote those more conservative viewpoints, and I'm not sure why, since that hasn't been a hallmark of much of Eastwood's other work. "Dirty Harry" had some of these impulses as well, but Eastwood's filmography as a whole is much more balanced than his recent work would suggest, in my opinion.

What does everyone else think?
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: exit00 on December 26, 2019, 05:48:47 PM
AKA23 - Im pretty much on the same page with all that you wrote.  Yeah, it does seem that Clint loves these stories about ordinary people becoming true heroes in some way.  And I also feel that I lose something watching a movie when I already know what the story is... where there is no surprises along the way... thus those movies aren't as powerful to me, no matter how well done they are.   I was also thinking earlier about a comparison between this movie and Dirty Harry... in the way many critics didn't "get it" and focused on some theme or agenda that wasn't the intent.  I remember words like "fascist" and "vigilante" being used when Dirty Harry came out where the real message I believe was just that Harry had enough of the usual bureaucracy that let the bad guys go free or innocent people die.  Likewise, critics are focusing too much on the negative view of an FBI agent and a newspaper reporter instead of the main story of how a rush to judgment by law enforcement and news media can really damage innocent people... which is even more pronounced in today's world it seems.  I don't know if the book said anything about the reporter and the FBI guy but I'm assuming that the script had it.  And we know that there was a most definite rush to judgment to name a suspect and how it so damaged the life of Jewell... and I think this is what drew Clint to make the film
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: AKA23 on December 27, 2019, 11:05:02 AM
I don't know how I forgot to mention this earlier, but Kathy Bates was definitely a stand out as Bobbi Jewell. She was perfectly cast as well, and played off nicely with Paul Walter Hauser.

Exit, I agree with you. I actually don't think that Clint's primary motivation for making "Richard Jewell," or any of the other films that I mentioned, was to push a conservative agenda, but taken together, they definitely are of a piece and do seem to promote those viewpoints or communicate admiration for persons who are admired by conservatives and criticism for institutions that are not. I thought that might generate some interesting discussion on the board about whether others also perceive that in Eastwood's recent work  and that some may have thoughts as to why that might be.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: -satu- on January 09, 2020, 04:58:01 AM
Have to wait until 21st Feb to see this when it comes out here. Luckily, Santa brought me a gift card for our movie theatre so I’m all set and ready to go when the time comes ;D
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: KC on January 09, 2020, 08:33:30 AM
We'll be looking forward to your report, satu! Always nice to hear from you. :)
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: antonis on January 17, 2020, 08:58:54 AM
The film premiered in Greece yesterday.As always for the past 28 years (since Unforgiven) I had to see it during its opening day. And so did I :)

I liked this one better than his previous "real life" efforts . Not a masterpiece but a solid good movie, with excellent performances from the whole cast .
The man made a -at least- watchable film out of nothing and with no professional actors a couple of years ago (15:17 ...) so this was an easier effort, which makes me wonder if he has become lazy. Apart from the lack of originality of his recently told stories all the films are common suburb dramas. No action here. Even the explotion scene is underplayed , as was the train attack in 15:17 or the plain crash in Sully. Perhaps this style echoes the director's approach . He doesn't care for the act but, for its consequences.

8/10

 
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: KC on January 18, 2020, 07:53:04 AM
"He doesn't care for the act but, for its consequences." I think you've hit on something there, antonis.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: palooka on February 04, 2020, 01:55:28 AM
I enjoyed it much more than I thought I would. A very solid film which was interesting from start to finish. Performances were excellent. Looking forward to a second viewing with Mrs Palooka.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: The Schofield Kid on February 04, 2020, 02:17:27 AM
I enjoyed it much more than I thought I would. A very solid film which was interesting from start to finish. Performances were excellent. Looking forward to a second viewing with Mrs Palooka.

No cameo in this one palooka?
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: palooka on February 06, 2020, 12:57:11 AM
No cameo in this one palooka?

Sadly not this time Schofield.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Macpherson on February 06, 2020, 03:28:12 PM
Have seen Richard Jewell twice since it opened in the UK......
Elegiac, character driven, organically emotional  yet restrained,  beautifully acted and with a powerful payoff this is Eastwood with his trademark depth.
This has to be one of the best cast Eastwood films.....all bring their A game to produce wonderful interaction and texture, wit and emotional wallop. ....
It is a chamber piece full of restraint, shot through with pathos and loss and yet it is a lovely,  life affirming  tale of friendship and family and mutual respect.
As with Million Dollar Baby, it's ultimately  a story of three human beings, that's all.
But  that's surely more than enough.
Eastwood panache ! .....

Incidentally,  I notice Richard Jewell has achieved "fresh" status on Rotten  Tomatoes
Q.E.D.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: higashimori on February 16, 2020, 02:21:39 PM

 I watched "Richard Jewell" in London last Tuesday before opening to the public in Paris!!  8)
 I liked it in a very human drama!  The actors were very natural and the music was nice too!  8)
 "Richard Jwell" was a good movie!  :)
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: KC on February 17, 2020, 12:53:42 AM
Glad you enjoyed it, Higashimori! :)
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: honkytonkman on February 17, 2020, 04:45:41 AM
Have seen the movie this saturday in Liège, Belgium.
A very good movie, captivating from start to finish.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Hocine on February 26, 2020, 12:59:14 AM
I have seen Richard Jewell last Saturday in Paris, France.
I really enjoyed it. Perhaps, the best Clint Eastwood film of the 2010s after The Mule and American Sniper.
Clint is still a great filmmaker and storyteller.
Paul Walter Hauser, Sam Rockwell and Kathy Bates gave some nice performances.
There’s a lot of emotion and sadness.
Clint Eastwood is not tired to talk about the failures and tragedies of America and its institutions, which are supposed to guarantee democracy and people’s liberties.
The film shows that these institutions can destroy some vulnerable people, depending on the circumstances.
But it also shows that as long as there will be some people who can stand against institutions’ failures, we can be optimistic.
Richard Jewell movie had many positive reviews in France.
Some of them said the film looks like a Frank Capra movie.

Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Gant on February 26, 2020, 03:24:15 AM
A very good, solid film.. Perhaps the kind of film I'd be happy to see sandwiched between more daring, fictional dramas from Clint.
I wasn't overly impressed with Sully and didn't bother with Paris. Three films (inc Sniper) where you already know the endings seems a bit much.. I kinda wish he'd just made this one ( not inc Sniper)
I agree with a lot of the comments above . The acting from everyone is superb. Once again Clint gets masterful performances from his cast, it's an enjoyable thought provoking piece..

As a side note some  British reviewers have made much of the scene implicating that the journalist Kathy Skruggs offered to engage in sex with an FBI agent in return for information... It's a shame this has  deflected (for some) from the quality of the film ( actually Sight and Sound gave it an excellent review) Personally I think  they're jumping on the bandwagon and making a little too much of this...
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: The Schofield Kid on February 27, 2020, 10:34:46 PM
A very good, solid film.. Perhaps the kind of film I'd be happy to see sandwiched between more daring, fictional dramas from Clint.
 
I agree with a lot of the comments above . The acting from everyone is superb. Once again Clint gets masterful performances from his cast, it's an enjoyable thought provoking piece..

I saw this last weekend was very impressed. Always good to go into a film with zero expectations. Agree with what Gant said above and can't add much more than what has already been said.

What I did notice were two scenes with a TV on in the background. One was of the film, The Sands Of Iwo Jima, starring one of America's hero's of the 20th century (onscreen at least) John Wayne. And one with Jimmy Stewart. Not only a hero onscreen but a real life WWII hero. I didn't see any credit in the final credits so I'm not sure what film it was but it clicked with me straight away how Clint juxaposed Richard Jewell with these other American heroes. Only a little thing some people may have missed but I thought it was extremely well done.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Saman Moradkhani on March 04, 2020, 12:48:59 AM
Finally, I got to see Richard Jewell last night. pretty solid film. one of Clint's very best paced, acted, photographed, and in overall, one of Clint's very best films. There are a couple of scenes that can be ranked among Eastwood's best achievements. They don't make films like this anymore, simple, deep and human. This is one of 2019's best films. Kudos.
10/10
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Christopher on March 04, 2020, 06:15:22 AM
Richard Jewell comes out on Blu-Ray and DVD in North America on March 17. The digital version might already be available. I missed it in theaters (I never made that drive to the theater that had it) so it'll be a rental for me.

It does seem like the reviews and audience response has been mostly positive.
Title: Re: Who saw RICHARD JEWELL? Members' Comments (NO SPOILERS, PLEASE)
Post by: Perry on November 27, 2020, 12:33:45 PM


 Got a chance to finally watch Richard Jewell last night. I thought it was an extremely well made movie with a terrific performance by Hauser. It's mind blowing, but I'm  not surprised why the movie didn't' do well at the box office. Basically we all know why so why waste my time explaining it...