1
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: THE ENDLESS, POINTLESS thread
« on: January 10, 2008, 01:58:44 AM »
Wow, good to see the site is still going strong and that this thread is still alive !!!
![]() DISCUSSION BOARD AND COMMUNITY - EST. 1996
| |
News: Having trouble registering? Please feel free to contact us at help[at]clinteastwood.org. We will help you get an account set up. |
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
sorry biddy no comprende what you're getting at. sorry the pic is so serious i was thinking of something at the time it was taken wasn't aware of the camera.
Good god Christopher i thought that movie was well dead and buried ...........i wont be able to sleep tonight now .....cheersÂ
Wong Kar-Wai is the world's greatest director.
But which of them is Snap, which is Crackle, and which is Pop .... never mind, Frankie is clearly Pop!
I was discussing "Million Dollar Baby" with a friend of mine who noticed that the film possessed a trinitarian theme. Not being familiar with Christian theology, this was something that I had not even considered, though it now seems more apparent to me.
The film's three main characters can provide a symbolic representation of the Holy Trinity: Frankie (the father), Maggie (the "son"), and Eddie (the holy ghost). Early in the film, we see a scene in which Frankie and the priest are discussing the Trinity, possibly providing some foreshadowing to the relationships between the characters. Considering the father-daughter bond formed between Frankie and Maggie ("Mo Cuishle") and that Eddie is called a "ghost" by one of the other boxers at the gym, I could see this as being intentional.
When reading Jim Emerson's (editor, RogerEbert.com) essay, I noticed that he mentioned something about how Christ's death could also be viewed as an assisted suicide since Jesus had chosen to die as a willing sacrifice. I can see how many people would find that statement offensive or controversial, but it's still interesting in the context of this analysis.
Perhaps this interpretation is far-fetched, but I thought that it was a beautiful way to see the film.