As long as its a straight port from the Collector's Edition DVD, I'll be happy.
Blu-ray VS HD-DVD = Betamax VS VHS
But looking at it from a computer programers standpoint, I'd go with Blu-ray.
1) When the PS3 is released ever single owner is going to have a Blu-ray drive, weither they wanted one or not. So already Blu-ray drives are in more homes then HD-DVD drives. That was the 360's mistake, not including a HD-DVD drive.
2) More space. Yes, HD-DVD holds a lot of memory, but if there is another format with more memory, I'm going to it.
HD-DVD - 30 gig
Blu-ray - 50 gig (Sony is working on a 200 gig disc. Why, I don't know)
Programmers need a lot of memory and these Blu-ray discs will be a blessing. Blu-ray is going to cost more the extra space is worth it.
3) More movie, tech, and gaming companies support Blu-ray then HD. More support means more products. And if you can overwhelm the competition with more product, then you usually win, usually.
Of course if you need HD content ASAP and you aren't sure which format to back, get a hybrid player.
http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/bluray...ming-183710.phpIn a move that must be spurred by desperation, Samsung and Toshiba have joined forces to design a player that will support both Blu-ray and HD-DVD formats, according to bit-tech. The site says the player will be available later this year or early 2007, just not in a next-gen console. Tom's Hardware is reporting that Sony is also looking at a hybrid player with NEC. Too bad we're so close to the PS3 launch, it would be great if they could just throw a hybrid player in there instead of Blu-ray.
Of course, Microsoft could always just throw out another gaming appendage down the line if they felt like taking the hybrid route or, don't hold your breath, decided to support Blu-ray.