|
|
|
Hocine
Sr. Member
   
Offline
Posts: 484
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: August 07, 2022, 04:16:35 PM » |
|
If Clint really wants to make an other picture, he should find an other studio. He has nothing to lose in doing so. Some 15 years ago, he made Changeling for Universal Studios. After all, Clint is not exclusively attached to Warner Bros, in spite of his unprecedented partnership with that studio. Indeed, Warner Bros remains an important part in film career of Clint. When some people like Ted Ashley, John Calley, Terry Semel, Bob Daly or Alan Horn worked at Warner Bros, it seemed to be more places for adult films, for many different films from ambitious filmmakers. But today, Warner Bros seems more interested in making DC films, Harry Potter films and even a Barbie film. It is what it is.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
AKA23
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 3633

|
 |
« Reply #44 on: August 08, 2022, 09:19:26 AM » |
|
I contacted the author of the article and he thinks this means that Eastwood likely won't have to retire, as another studio will likely be interested in him making movies for them, even if it may not be this particular one.
I belong to another forum that Holden Pike is a member of, who is one of our most knowledgeable veteran members here about film. He rarely posts anymore, and he said this:
One of the streamers, Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, or Apple+, would absolutely love to be in the Clint Eastwood business. Whatever and however much business may be left. He works on relatively modest budgets, has never gone over them, can easily draw in other known actors to work with him, and with the streamers not reliant on box office as a metric, uh, yeah, I am sure if he has a project to shop he will have multiple non-Warner Brothers buyers.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|