karldotcom
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: November 06, 2003, 06:39:27 PM » |
|
I just pulled a current report off the WB site... Mystic River has grossed $35.142 million domestic cumulative, is currently playing on 1551 screens, and is averaging a little over $500k per day. Matrix Revolutions opened on 3502 screens, and did $24.1 million (domestic) Wednesday. It's competing with the largest movies now in two or three thousand theaters, and it doesn't even have 1,500 theaters.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
AKA23
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 3571

|
 |
« Reply #21 on: November 06, 2003, 08:12:28 PM » |
|
Thanks for those stats, Karldot! It's nice to see a post from you. I've been wondering where you've been and how you've been doing. I had been checking on boxofficemojo a few days ago and other sites for the theater numbers, and those might have been out of step with Warners latest numbers, which I presume should be the most accurate, so thank you for the update. Perhaps it's in an adequate number of theaters right now, but I think that even with the 1551 or so, it could benefit from being in more theaters. I can tell you that in Santa Cruz a bit ago the only theater that was showing it stopped showing it, so if you haven't seen it in Santa Cruz yet, you're basically out of luck. There is probably a similar situation going on in other parts of the state and country, as well.
|
|
« Last Edit: November 06, 2003, 08:28:04 PM by AKA23 »
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AKA23
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 3571

|
 |
« Reply #27 on: November 13, 2003, 03:55:18 PM » |
|
I think Eastwood took the Director's Guild minimum, and was hoping to make some money if the picture did well. I think the other actors got paid substantially more, but must have compensated to work with Eastwood in terms of getting less than they'd usually get on a picture. I don't think that the actors worked for scale, though. I've never heard that, but perhaps they did. I don't know conclusively.
Christopher, as KC implied, the picture has grossed 41 million or so, but this doesn't all go to Warners themselves. Much of it goes to the theaters individually, and to other places, not to the studio. Therefore, although Mystic River is currently a large critical success, commercially, at least at this point, the film is a financial loss for Warner Bros and Eastwood. The company has not yet made back what they've spent on the film, and this is probably not likely to change. Unless Oscar nominations and such keep this going in theaters for a long time and motivate a lot of people who wouldn't ordinarily see the fillm to see it, I don't see the film making 40 or 50 million dollars more in order to break even, or 100 million or so in order to be considered a financial breakthrough.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Doug
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 2940

"May I make a suggestion..."
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: November 13, 2003, 10:11:55 PM » |
|
Christopher, as KC implied, the picture has grossed 41 million or so, but this doesn't all go to Warners themselves. Much of it goes to the theaters individually, and to other places, not to the studio. Therefore, although Mystic River is currently a large critical success, commercially, at least at this point, the film is a financial loss for Warner Bros and Eastwood. The company has not yet made back what they've spent on the film, and this is probably not likely to change. Unless Oscar nominations and such keep this going in theaters for a long time and motivate a lot of people who wouldn't ordinarily see the fillm to see it, I don't see the film making 40 or 50 million dollars more in order to break even, or 100 million or so in order to be considered a financial breakthrough.
What are you an accountant for WB now, AKA?  Don't forget there's rental and video sales still to go. And this movie is most definitely doing far better than anyone at WB could have imagined at the outset. Nobody at WB is crying over this film's grosses.
|
|
« Last Edit: November 13, 2003, 10:12:50 PM by Doug »
|
Logged |
"Yes, well, when I see five weirdos dressed in togas stabbing a guy in the middle of a park in full view of a hundred people, I shoot the bastards, that's my policy." Frank Drebin, Police Squad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hammerhead
Sr. Member
   
Offline
Posts: 293

Get the hell out of the way, hammerhead.
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: November 19, 2003, 08:46:03 AM » |
|
didn't last long in the uk 
i never got to see it again
According to boxofficemojo.com, it made $2,537,805 (£1,494,345). Pretty disappointing considering the amount of publicity that Clint did for it over here. Mind you, to put things in perspective, Blood Work took $266,386 across the UK.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Brendan
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 6030

|
 |
« Reply #35 on: November 30, 2003, 06:24:35 PM » |
|
Mystic River took in $2,040,000 this past weekend, and moved back up to fourteenth.
It has brought in $50,960,000 so far (North American).
So since studios get about 55% of the final take, I'd say, so far, the WB has gotten about $29 million. So it brought back in it's budget, roughly.
And since it will continue with more business, and combined with product placements, DVD/VHS sales and rentals and cable TV syndication, I figure River will do well for Warners.
|
|
« Last Edit: November 30, 2003, 06:24:50 PM by Brendan »
|
Logged |
|
|
|