|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
little_bill
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 1354

|
 |
« Reply #16 on: November 05, 2005, 05:30:09 AM » |
|
theres no question who was more musically talented, the beatles all wrote and recorded hit songs not just together but seperately, that said i'm siding with elvis, i just love his early rock and roll stuff along with his vegas days he'd a tremendous voice, but like most singers way back in the 50's he didn't write half the stuff he's credited with, the colonel was a great manager working out deals that involved crediting elvis on the songs (you could have 50& creit and royalties on your own song and have elvis sell millions of copies all overthe world, or it could rest on the shelf til someone recorded it and you would get 100% of the royalties for a couple of thousand sales.)
I'm sticking with Elvis as the question is who do you prefer, but you have to admit musically the beatles were way ahead in their talent, i just don't think any beatle had a voice to match Elvis'
|
|
|
Logged |
He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot.- Groucho Marx
|
|
|
|
|
|