|
KC
Administrator
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 32408

Control ...
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2010, 11:10:28 PM » |
|
I was at the second screening at the New York Festival tonight ... the one that was supposed to start at ten PM, but didn't actually begin until about 10:45. Clint came out on stage to thank us for coming before the film, but he didn't appear afterward. No wonder; it was nearly 1 AM before it was finished.
Right now, I'm only going to say that I enjoyed the film, but thought it somewhat uneven. The opening scene, in which a tsunami strikes a seaside resort, was overwhelming, and several other scenes were very moving. Like several critics who have weighed in already, I thought the ending was a bit too pat. The performances were all fine, particularly Damon's and Cecile de France's, and there's an unexpected cameo by Derek Jacobi toward the end.
Also, our friend Palooka will be pleased to learn that he is very visible onscreen during his scene, in which Matt Damon's character tours the Charles Dickens house in London.
Afterward, I told the friend who accompanied me that if I hadn't known who the director was, I don't think I would have guessed it was Clint Eastwood. I might, however, have guessed who composed the score, which I thought was very well done and well used in the movie.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Lin Sunderland
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2010, 11:17:13 PM » |
|
Having read your comments KC, I am even more keen to see Hereafter than I was yesterday!  So you saw Clint. Wonderful. How many times have you seen him before? Was matt there too? Great to learn Palooka is easy to spot. It makes the movie even better when you actually know someone in it, apart from the stars of course. 
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
palooka
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 573

|
 |
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2010, 11:34:30 PM » |
|
I was at the second screening at the New York Festival tonight ... the one that was supposed to start at ten PM, but didn't actually begin until about 10:45. Clint came out on stage to thank us for coming before the film, but he didn't appear afterward. No wonder; it was nearly 1 AM before it was finished.
Right now, I'm only going to say that I enjoyed the film, but thought it somewhat uneven. The opening scene, in which a tsunami strikes a seaside resort, was overwhelming, and several other scenes were very moving. Like several critics who have weighed in already, I thought the ending was a bit too pat. The performances were all fine, particularly Damon's and Cecile de France's, and there's an unexpected cameo by Derek Jacobi toward the end.
Also, our friend Palooka will be pleased to learn that he is very visible onscreen during his scene, in which Matt Damon's character tours the Charles Dickens house in London.
Afterward, I told the friend who accompanied me that if I hadn't known who the director was, I don't think I would have guessed it was Clint Eastwood. I might, however, have guessed who composed the score, which I thought was very well done and well used in the movie.
Thanks so much KC. You are the first confirmation of that. Even a good friend of mine at Warner Brothers hasn't seen it yet!
|
|
|
Logged |
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
|
|
|
KC
Administrator
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 32408

Control ...
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2010, 11:35:26 PM » |
|
I saw four actors from the film when they arrived for the first screening ... I was standing near the barricade that cut off the hoi polloi from the red carpet guests. There were some professional autograph seekers there, too, and they managed to lure four people over: Steve Schirripa, who plays a cooking school teacher in the movie; Jenifer Lewis ... I believe she plays a woman who seeks Damon's character's help contacting a deceased person; Bryce Dallas Howard; and Cécile de France. I was amazed that the pros knew who she was; I don't think I'd recognize her if I bumped into her on the street.
I know Matt Damon was there, because I've seen pictures on the Internet (as an aside, there's a funny moment in the film when Damon tries to tell a kid he's not who he (the kid) thinks he is, and the kid retorts, "Oh, yes you are, I've seen it on the Internet!"). But I didn't see him, and our pros apparently didn't glimpse him either. They did see Clint, and shouted for him to come over and sign, but he didn't, and all I could see were the flashes of cameras going off. I'm glad he did make an appearance before the second screening.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Sylvie
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 2173

|
 |
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2010, 02:32:17 AM » |
|
I was at the second screening at the New York Festival tonight ... the one that was supposed to start at ten PM, but didn't actually begin until about 10:45. Clint came out on stage to thank us for coming before the film, but he didn't appear afterward. No wonder; it was nearly 1 AM before it was finished.
Right now, I'm only going to say that I enjoyed the film, but thought it somewhat uneven. The opening scene, in which a tsunami strikes a seaside resort, was overwhelming, and several other scenes were very moving. Like several critics who have weighed in already, I thought the ending was a bit too pat. The performances were all fine, particularly Damon's and Cecile de France's, and there's an unexpected cameo by Derek Jacobi toward the end.
Also, our friend Palooka will be pleased to learn that he is very visible onscreen during his scene, in which Matt Damon's character tours the Charles Dickens house in London.
Afterward, I told the friend who accompanied me that if I hadn't known who the director was, I don't think I would have guessed it was Clint Eastwood. I might, however, have guessed who composed the score, which I thought was very well done and well used in the movie.
 Thank you KC for your comments ! It will be long to wait for it on French screen now ... And of course I will go to see it on the first day 
|
|
|
Logged |
"If she looks back, that means she's interested . Come on now, give me a little look. One little glance back..." 2007 Movie journal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MC
Sr. Member
   
Offline
Posts: 349

|
 |
« Reply #16 on: December 07, 2010, 01:28:06 PM » |
|
I'm surprised there have been so few comments on the board about what is clearly (at least to me) a deeply felt film for Eastwood ... regardless of what you think of the final results
Overall I thoroughly enjoyed Hereafter, probably ranking it as his best film since Letters from Iwo Jima (though I'll have to see Hereafter again to better judge it versus Gran Torino.)
I'll start with the negative: I didn't care for the use of music in many spots in the film. Though the score itself is fine, Eastwood seems to punctuate each emotional moment with a musical cue, which struck me as unusual for a director who prides himself in letting the audience think for itself (and also completely unnecessary, since there were many moving scenes in the film that stood on their own).
Outside of that element, and another item I'll discuss in the spoilers thread, I was quite impressed with Hereafter. The opening tsunami scene is extraordinary, brilliantly executed and unlike anything Eastwood's done. I agree with the critic who noted that Eastwood's decision to stay with the character through the scene really draws the viewer into the horror of the situation.
Matt Damon was superb, again confirming my belief that he's an ideal counterpoint for Eastwood, constantly underplaying the part to strong effect. Eastwood's direction (credit Peter Morgan's script as well) smartly conveys the isolation and loneliness of the Damon character. Great stuff.
Cecile de France is also excellent, yet another strong female character to add to the legion of Eastwood's female protagonists.
And speaking of the acting, one of the things that separated Hereafter from many of Eastwood's recent films for me were the uniformly solid performances, include standout work from the young twins, Bryce Dallas Howard as a Damon romantic interest with a secret past, and Jennifer Lewis (making the most of a few seconds of screen time) as a woman desperate for Damon to communicate with her dead kin.
Some people have complained about the pacing, but I felt like every scene contributed to the plot or a characterization.
Overall, a powerful film that I'd highly recommend. Great to see Eastwood continuing to try new things.
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
|