AKA23
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 3633

|
 |
« Reply #40 on: September 01, 2012, 08:08:18 AM » |
|
Here's an article detailing the setup for Eastwood's speech. Apparently, as I may have pointed out earlier, the Romney campaign trusted Eastwood, so they didn't vet what he was going to say. They also didn't approve his use of the empty chair or his improvisational routine. A few minutes before showtiime, Eastwood asked for a chair, but they thought he would likely sit in it. They didn't know what it was for. Eastwood was apparently only slotted to speak for 5 minutes, but spoke for 12, and ignored the red flashing light that told him he was done. I personally found this article to be very interesting. If anyone else is interested, here's a link: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/01/us/politics/romney-aides-scratch-their-heads-over-eastwoods-speech.html
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
AKA23
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 3633

|
 |
« Reply #41 on: September 01, 2012, 08:11:32 AM » |
|
Bill Maher, who is a left-leaning stand-up comedian, has defended Eastwood. I'm hesitant to post a link, since some of his comments are politically charged, and the moderators don't like political commentary on the board, but I will post the excerpt that relates to Eastwood's speech. These were Maher's thoughts: On his HBO show on Friday, Maher gave the actor “props” for pretending that President Obama was sitting in an empty chair next to him onstage. “As a performer, as a stand-up comedian for 30 years who knows how hard it is to get laughs, excuse me, he went up there … without a net, on a tightrope. There was no teleprompter. He did a bit with just an empty chair and killed,” Maher said. “He committed to it, it was consistent and it worked.” “People have been saying for years: these conventions are too scripted, they’re too slick, they’re too overproduced,” he added. “A guy who went up there who wasn’t slick … and killed with the crowd? I gotta give him props for that.”
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KC
Administrator
Member Extraordinaire
    
Offline
Posts: 32408

Control ...
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: September 04, 2012, 07:58:33 PM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jed Cooper
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
    
Online
Posts: 5244

|
 |
« Reply #59 on: September 05, 2012, 11:01:00 AM » |
|
I saw Clint speak as it happened and I’m sticking with my initial impression. It was weird. Clint seemed uncomfortable, as if he was out of place. In a sense, he was. Public speaking is not his forte. He’s not very good at it even when accepting awards. That’s not to say he’s a bad person and it has nothing to do with his view on politics. The delivery was just plain bad and unconvincing. I honestly believe if more care were given to the manner in which he was speaking, his speech would’ve been much more effective and would not have been criticized to the degree it has been thus far. Not only that, I feel he would’ve received a standing ovation. So yes, there were things he stated that made all the sense in the world, some of what he attempted to be funny with did come off as amusing. I understand and respect other’s opinions that differ from mine on this matter. However, to me, over all, it was just not very good.  
|
|
« Last Edit: September 05, 2012, 11:02:12 AM by Jed Cooper »
|
Logged |
“Eyuh.”
|
|
|