News: Now showing in theaters: CRY MACHO, directed by and starring Clint Eastwood!


0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this board.
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Clint's acting ability  (Read 8770 times)
Rawhide7
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1289



View Profile Email
« on: July 28, 2014, 02:20:26 PM »

I recently read an article online about James Garner being a great tv star but not being able to carry a lead on the big screen due to limited acting abilities.  They said he did have some very good movie's but not great.  This person went on to say that Clint Eastwood is a prime example of this.  They said that he has limited acting abilities.  But that he is a star because he has great presence.  And to be a star you either have to be a great actor with great acting ability or you have to have great presence.  And since Clint has great presence he became a star and a legend.  My take, there's no doubt that Clint does have great onscreen presence.  And he has alot of Charisma and is extremely likable because of his great presence and manurisms and such.  But I also believe he is a great actor who does have some good acting abilities as well.  Maybe in the very beginning he had some limited acting abilities.  But for me I thouight his acting was very good in the dollars trilogy.  And he got better and better through the yrs.  Espicially with the which way movies, In the Line of Fire, and some of his other drama movies as well.  Just wanted some of your thoughts on this? Because I hear alot of people always say ya I like Clint Eastwood alot but he's not really a very good actor.  I am a huge Eastwood fan and like him alot.  And the reason why I am a huge fan of his is because he does have great presence in films and he is very likable and entertaining.  But also because I really enjoy the movies he's in and because I like his acting as well.
Logged
KC
Administrator
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 32408


Control ...


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2014, 06:52:16 PM »

Rawhide, you haven't got a link to that article, do you?
Logged
Gant
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6648


You gotta be durable...real durable. Most ain't


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2014, 12:03:43 AM »

To me Clint is nearly always convincing (aside from True Crime :) ) in the roles he takes on which are often quite varied so to me at the very least he's a very good actor....and a great judge of scripts....
Logged

Borderline burnout with questionable social skills
The Schofield Kid
Global Moderator
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24989


All on account of pulling a trigger.


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2014, 11:51:30 PM »

To me, Clint seems to me to get better with age. The first 30 years and he was mainly known for his action films. He did show he could do more than that with The Beguiled and Play Misty For Me to name just two from early on but from the 1990's with Unforgiven, In The Line Of Fire, The Bridges Of Madison County, Million Dollar Baby he has shown he can act in serious dramas.
Logged

"Winners are simply willing to do what losers won't."
Perry
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1144


I'm a llama!


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2014, 07:54:29 PM »

 

          'Tightrope' was probably the first film where I felt Eastwood showed me something as far as acting prowess in a long time.. I thought he was very good in ' The Beguiled', but Tightrope was a complex and dark role for Eastwood and it was nice to see instead of the mediocre 'Sudden Impact' and tired role of H.C. the year before.
Logged
The Man With No Aim
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 563


"There are two kinds of men in this world"


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2014, 11:16:43 PM »

Coming at a relatively early time in his entire acting career, Beguiled showed an amazing acting ability. In my opinion anyway.

And when I saw Misty, in roughly the same time frame of his career, I was equally greatly impressed. I believe that there was no role he could not have perfectly successfully fulfilled. 

He has always had the ability to completely inhabit the persona of the role, and to "own the stage". Always perfectly believable.


Best Regards
Manwith Noaim
Logged

"In all the excitement I lost count myself'
Jed Cooper
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5240



View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2014, 06:35:23 AM »

To me, Clint seems to me to get better with age. The first 30 years and he was mainly known for his action films. He did show he could do more than that with The Beguiled and Play Misty For Me to name just two from early on but from the 1990's with Unforgiven, In The Line Of Fire, The Bridges Of Madison County, Million Dollar Baby he has shown he can act in serious dramas.

Very interesting and I agree.
Logged

“Eyuh.”
Jed Cooper
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5240



View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2014, 06:37:11 AM »



          'Tightrope' was probably the first film where I felt Eastwood showed me something as far as acting prowess in a long time.. I thought he was very good in ' The Beguiled', but Tightrope was a complex and dark role for Eastwood and it was nice to see instead of the mediocre 'Sudden Impact' and tired role of H.C. the year before.

I remember there being talk of a possible Oscar not for Clint's performance in Tightrope.  Even to be nominated would've been cool, especially since the film did so well and on the hells of the immensely successful and popular Sudden Impact. 
Logged

“Eyuh.”
Jed Cooper
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5240



View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2014, 06:49:17 AM »

To me, Clint Eastwood is the greatest actor ever.  Of course, that's my opinion and can't be wrong because it's just that, my opinion.  I do acknowledge the fact that there are better and more successful actors out there, but when it comes to favorites, Clint wins hands down.  No contest.  After all, it's his performance in the Leone trilogy and first three Dirty Harry films that convinced me Eastwood was my favorite.  I've been fortunate as a fan over the years since in that he's produced quite a number of films that have been enjoyable, insightful and entertaining on different levels.  Variety is great, but when it comes to favorites, after all, there can be only one "number one."   ;)


 
 
« Last Edit: October 10, 2014, 06:50:37 AM by Jed Cooper » Logged

“Eyuh.”
AKA23
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3602



View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: October 16, 2014, 08:01:07 AM »

I'm pretty sure that it's practically impossible to determine who is the "best actor" ever, since art is by its nature subjective. I don't know what metric could or should be used to judge that either. For example, Jack Nicholson has three acting Oscars, which is among the most ever for an actor, so by that metric, many would consider him to be one of the best actors ever, but some people who I respect, like KC, don't like Jack Nicholson. Does that make KC wrong, since her opinion isn't representative of the consensus of his peers, or does that just mean that KC might be looking for something different than the type of acting that the Academy rewards? This is not just true for KC but is true for practically every viewer and every actor.

To use a personal example, Daniel Day Lewis also has three Oscars, so many would consider him one of the best actor ever as well. I agree that Day Lewis is a great actor, but Eastwood is far more enjoyable to watch for me. He has a far greater and more likable screen presence in my opinion. I think it would be fair to say that Clint Eastwood is my favorite actor. There's no one who I'd rather see in a new film, and there are no films that I'm more excited to see than the ones that he's in. Does that make him the "best actor ever?" I don't think so, but he's still my favorite.   
Logged
Jed Cooper
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5240



View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: October 16, 2014, 09:06:52 AM »

^^^
As usual, AKA, you have provided a very interesting observation.  I guess my point is that regardless of others' opinions and awards and success other actors have had, to me Clint Eastwood is still the best actor ever.  I can comfortably say that without reservation or doubt because ones own opinion is never wrong to themselves.  It's because I enjoy what Eastwood has done so much more than all that have come before him and since that makes it possible for me to make such a statement.  I know that may not make sense when comparing Mr. Eastwood's acting ability and success in that field to other actors considered much greater and have won many more awards and critical acclaim.  But that's the whole point of having a favorite, isn't it?  I mean, I guess that's the way I see it.  Of course, when others tell me their opinions of who they consider the greatest actor ever, I may not agree with them but I believe what they're saying be it because said actor is their favorite and/or whatever reasons are given. 
Logged

“Eyuh.”
herofan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 310



View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2014, 07:16:46 PM »

Clint has a great stage presence, and for me, has always been believable in all the roles he has played. 

Perhaps the comments about him having limited acting ability is because he chose for so many years to not express a wide range of characters, and he doesn't usually offer up a large range of emotion in his characters, but takes everything in a laid back manner. 

I'm not an acting expert, but as a kid, I always saw him as the same guy in most of his movies, and I loved that, I always knew what to expect.  I kinda saw the same guy in Fist Full, Coogan's Bluff, Dirty Harry, and High plains Drifter, just to name a few.  Perhaps a psychologist or acting expert could convince me they are all totally different characters, but their personalities were quite similar; he played it that way in those years.  It wasn't like he played Dirty Harry, then played a guy with autism, then did a Tootsie character,  then played a total wimp, and then played Abe Lincoln, but his characters were similar, at least in my opinion.  That's what I loved. 
Logged
Elizabeth77
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1298



View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: October 27, 2014, 08:15:41 PM »

Clint has a great stage presence, and for me, has always been believable in all the roles he has played. 

Perhaps the comments about him having limited acting ability is because he chose for so many years to not express a wide range of characters, and he doesn't usually offer up a large range of emotion in his characters, but takes everything in a laid back manner.

I think herofan has touched on what draws me to Clint as an actor.  While he is certainly capable of a wide range of emotions, his characters are usually very reserved in their emotional expressions.  I find this very attractive because it is like the most important men in my life, as well as characteristic of myself.  In other words, I can relate.

I don't really care if Clint is the "best actor ever", he's one of my favorites.  His films have provided me with many hours of entertainment, some of them rather more thought-provoking than entertaining, but there's always Clint who can be relied on to accomplish things his own way.
Logged

"Thought I was having trouble with my adding.  It's all right now."
KC
Administrator
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 32408


Control ...


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2014, 09:19:31 PM »

Very well put, Elizabeth. I tend to feel the same way.
Logged
Perry
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1144


I'm a llama!


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2014, 04:01:07 PM »


Yeah, Eastwood was always convincing. I never understood Chuck Norris who always reminded me of Glen Campbell with a black belt.
Logged
Jed Cooper
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5240



View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: November 02, 2014, 09:39:49 PM »

I just finished watching In The Line Of Fire.  I think Clint's acting is superb in it, especially the scene where he tells Lilly about what happened in Dallas.  I'm in agreement with you, Perry.  When I first came across Eastwood films, it was his convincing portrayal of the characters I was viewing at the time that made me want to see more of his movies.  I also agree with you, Elizabeth77, the determination and manner in which Clint portrayed his characters to accomplish a given task is another reason I sought out other performances and why, before long, I came to the conclusion that he was my favorite. I know that my merely declaring Clint Eastwood is the greatest actor of all time isn't agreed upon by all, but it's reasons like the ones I just mentioned that I can honestly say that about him in my opinion. I know Clint won't ever be compared to "great actors" past, present and future but what's great about having a favorite or favorites is that in the end, it's your own opinion that outweighs all other facts, statistics, accolades and opinion.  Seeing In The Line Of Fire again tonight reminded me of how I thought Eastwood's acting seemed to improve beginning with Unforgiven.  At some point I found a gem of a scene in The Gauntlet that made me think of the Frank & Lilly scene I spoke of earlier.  It was where Shockley was telling Mally about why he decided to become a cop.  I didn't think it at the time I first saw it, but years later I thought his acting in that scene was as convincingly good and effective.  I'm still holding out hope for at least one more starring role from Mr. Eastwood. You never know.
Logged

“Eyuh.”
The Man With No Aim
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 563


"There are two kinds of men in this world"


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2014, 10:28:35 PM »

I just finished watching Fistful Of Dollars in decent viewing conditions for the first time in my old man's life.

It was amazing. Clint simply grabbed the Joe persona, put him in his pocket, and, walked away with it.

I have never seen any other actor, in his first major film role, or, in his 100th, pick up a role and perfectly and completely OWN that role like Clint did in Fistful. All the others always look like they were working at it. Clint has always simply been doing it.

Best actor of all time. Clint and then a long way back is somebody, whoever, in 2nd place.


Manwith
Logged

"In all the excitement I lost count myself'
The Man With No Aim
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 563


"There are two kinds of men in this world"


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: November 21, 2014, 12:41:41 AM »

Just finished watching For A Few Dollars More in good viewing conditions.

Not long ago watched Fistful Of Dollars in good conditions.

Very few, if any, other actors, have demonstrated such a total mastery in the acting craft in their first two starring film roles.

And Clint was just getting started.

Best actor ever. A no brainer.


Manwith
Logged

"In all the excitement I lost count myself'
herofan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 310



View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: November 23, 2014, 08:17:53 PM »

I don't really care if Clint is the "best actor ever", he's one of my favorites.  His films have provided me with many hours of entertainment, some of them rather more thought-provoking than entertaining, but there's always Clint who can be relied on to accomplish things his own way.

Same here.  I'm not an actor myself, so I wouldn't know how to score it technically.  All I know is he is one of my favorites and I've always believed his characters.

Once you get to be a good actor, what makes one a great actor anyway?  Sure, we all have seen performances by someone who seemed like they were reading it off a card or in an elementary play, but I only know if I enjoy the character; I don't keep a technical score card.  For example, Jack Nicholson has the reputation for being one of the best.  Well, I can't argue with that, but I've never watched him and thought, "Wow, he is so much more believable than Clint." 
Logged
AKA23
Classic Member
Member Extraordinaire
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3602



View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: November 25, 2014, 11:59:37 AM »

Same here.  I'm not an actor myself, so I wouldn't know how to score it technically.  All I know is he is one of my favorites and I've always believed his characters.

Once you get to be a good actor, what makes one a great actor anyway?

I think that for many, what makes a great actor is that when assuming the role they become the character. Great actors usually aren't perceived to be star personalities, and often are not perceived to be the icons that Eastwood clearly is. To put some context to this, for me personally, I consider really great actors to be actors that have a lot of versatility. They can assume almost any role believably. I think the perception that most people have of Clint Eastwood is that he's a huge star who assumes a persona, and does variations of that persona repeatedly in his films. As you state, Eastwood has almost always been believable in his roles, but I don't think Eastwood has shown the versatility that most people consider to be the hallmark of a great actor. For example, I think Meryl Streep is a great actress. She isn't just playing variations on the same character in her films. She can embody almost any role, and she can do so believably. I think that is what separates an icon like Eastwood from the very top of performers who are widely considered by many to be the greatest actors. Eastwood is still my favorite actor by far though, and I do think he's a better actor than he is usually given credit for. I hope that answers your question.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
 




C L I N T E A S T W O O D . N E T